Search alternatives:
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
2
-
3
Fluctuation trend of the mean temperature index.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
4
Variation curve of the mean temperature index.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
5
Mann-Kendall test for the mean temperature index.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
6
The Date.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
7
Variation curve of the extreme temperature index.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
11
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Ambient Air Pollutant Dynamics (2010–2025) and the Exceptional Winter 2016–17 Pollution Episode: Implications for a Uranium/Arsenic Exposure Event
Published 2025“…Original, measured values retain a flag of 0.<br><br><i>2. Mean Imputation Fallback for Predictors:</i> Any remaining gaps in these non-PM₂.₅ pollutant columns (after linear interpolation) were filled using the overall column mean (sklearn.impute.SimpleImputer(strategy='mean')) to ensure a complete predictor set for the subsequent step. …”