Search alternatives:
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant event » significant effect (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search), significant effects (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
Supplementary data.
Published 2025“…In contrast, the addition of hydrogen at 26 °C caused a significant decrease in the photophysiology of both <i>Acropora</i> sp. and <i>P. verrucosa</i>. …”
-
155
Upper-crust thermal evolution of the Patagonian Precordillera basement (Argentina): insights from fission track, (U-Th)/He thermochronology and geodynamic significance
Published 2025“…Results thus indicate that one of the most significant exhumation event recorded in basement rocks of the Patagonian Andean foreland took place during the late Early Cretaceous – Paleocene stage.…”
-
156
-
157
-
158
-
159
Design of the D-trial.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
160
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”