Search alternatives:
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
factor based » factors based (Expand Search), vector based (Expand Search), factors used (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
factor based » factors based (Expand Search), vector based (Expand Search), factors used (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Summary of the earliest time point for significant WD-induced changes in NASH-associated markers.
Published 2023“…The figure illustrates the earliest time point for a significant change in the marker abundance and whether the marker <b>Increased</b> or <b>Decreased</b> in response to the WD. …”
-
7
-
8
Estimated effects of the intervention packages on the incidence of NCDs metabolic risk factors.
Published 2024Subjects: -
9
The difference in NCDs metabolic risk factors’ prevalence between the two surveys.
Published 2024Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
<i>BZP4</i> expression differs significantly between genotypes.
Published 2023“…<p><b>A.</b> Points representing the difference in transcript abundance between conditions in transcript per million (TPM) in segregants with each parental allele under the chromosome 8 QTL. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Error bars represent ± SEM; n.s., non significant,*<i>P</i> < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA. …”
-
16
Change in the levels of parental stressors or rewards between time point 1 and time point 2.
Published 2022Subjects: -
17
-
18
Top significantly changed pathways based on their calculated enrichment factor and significance value.
Published 2021“…<p>Top significantly changed pathways based on their calculated enrichment factor and significance value.…”
-
19
AMPs are increased in lesional HS, but DCD and other sweat-gland associated proteins are decreased.
Published 2019“…Genes represented in orange were unchanged (FC < 2, p-adj < 0.05) in HS lesional vs. HS non-lesional skin. Non-adjusted p-values were used for generation of the volcano plot to minimize points with tied y-values but significance level was set using the corresponding non-adjusted p-values. …”
-
20