Search alternatives:
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
factor decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
factor decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
-
165
Model A: Logistic structural model.
Published 2024“…Greater distance from care predicts greater HPV vaccine hesitancy and decreased intent to vaccinate against HPV. …”
-
166
Split structural models for belief.
Published 2024“…<p>Trust in government and positive general vaccine attitudes predicted greater intent to vaccinate. No other latent variables or covariates significantly affected intent to vaccinate. …”
-
167
-
168
Test soil parameters.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
169
Influence of UHMWPE length on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
170
UHMWPF parameters.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
171
Influence of UHMWPE content on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
172
Soil partice-size distribution.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
173
-
174
-
175
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
176
Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
177
-
178
-
179
Global average ignition delay time of oil droplets with volume of 0.1-0.5ml.
Published 2025Subjects: -
180