Search alternatives:
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
221
-
222
-
223
-
224
-
225
-
226
-
227
-
228
Demographic and ocular features.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
229
Machine learning model to diagnose PCG.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
230
ROC curves of TAS + SOD + MDA to diagnose PCG.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
231
-
232
-
233
-
234
-
235
-
236
-
237
-
238
-
239
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
240