Search alternatives:
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Box plot show that there are no differences between different groups of the size of pus cavity.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
-
7
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
8
Pie charts showing the different patterns of risk factors associated with total colony losses.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
-
11
Kaplan-Meier curves and time-dependent Cox regression for outcome of mortality.
Published 2024Subjects: -
12
Cox regression models for adverse cardiovascular events (ACE) and individual components of ACE.
Published 2024Subjects: -
13
-
14
Baseline demographics and comorbidities by presence of post-treatment adverse cardiovascular events.
Published 2024Subjects: -
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20