Search alternatives:
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
261
-
262
-
263
-
264
-
265
-
266
-
267
-
268
-
269
-
270
-
271
-
272
-
273
-
274
-
275
-
276
-
277
-
278
Flow diagram of participants selection.
Published 2025“…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
-
279
Minimal data set.
Published 2025“…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
-
280
Weighted comparison of baseline characteristics.
Published 2025“…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”