Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction terms » interaction term (Expand Search), interaction energy (Expand Search), interaction networks (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction terms » interaction term (Expand Search), interaction energy (Expand Search), interaction networks (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
Published 2019“…Consistent with the colours used in the previous figures, attended images are represented by the dark green lines and unattended images by the light green lines, while the pink–red gradient indicates increasing expectation. The significance of the interaction term was tested using the likelihood ratio test between the full model and the reduced model, which excluded the interaction fixed effect. …”
-
79
Numbers of stage 1 significant variants.
Published 2021“…Significance was assessed for both 1df interaction terms and 2df joint terms. …”
-
80