Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
interaction test » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction term (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
interaction test » interaction tests (Expand Search), interaction term (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
T-test Results of the groups’ self-directed learning skill post-test scores.
Published 2025Subjects: -
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
Stacked Manhattan plots of genome-wide significant SNPs.
Published 2024“…The −log<sub>10</sub> <i>p</i>-values (with further log<sub>10</sub> transformation on y-axis to aid presentation) are shown for the five association methods, including <i>T</i><sub><i>Female</i></sub> (Female-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Male</i></sub> (Male-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Diff</i></sub> (SNP-sex interaction-only test), <i>T</i><sub>1,<i>metaL</i></sub> (the traditional sex-combined meta-analysis), and <i>T</i><sub>2,<i>metaQ</i></sub> (the omnibus meta-analysis); see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011221#pgen.1011221.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for method details. …”
-
69
Stacked Manhattan plots of genome-wide significant SNPs.
Published 2024“…The −log<sub>10</sub> <i>p</i>-values (with further log<sub>10</sub> transformation on y-axis to aid presentation) are shown for the five association methods, including <i>T</i><sub><i>Female</i></sub> (Female-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Male</i></sub> (Male-only analysis), <i>T</i><sub><i>Diff</i></sub> (SNP-sex interaction-only test), <i>T</i><sub>1,<i>metaL</i></sub> (the traditional sex-combined meta-analysis), and <i>T</i><sub>2,<i>metaQ</i></sub> (the omnibus meta-analysis); see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011221#pgen.1011221.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for method details. …”
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
Significance (Fisher’s exact test) of RBP binds to promoters of genes targeted by nuclear lncRNAs bound by the RBP that interacts with promoter RBP.
Published 2024“…<p>Significance (Fisher’s exact test) of RBP binds to promoters of genes targeted by nuclear lncRNAs bound by the RBP that interacts with promoter RBP.…”
-
74
-
75
Bi-directional MR results for the four metabolites significant in the interaction QTL analysis.
Published 2024Subjects: -
76
Statistical significance maps for antibiotic-antivirulence drug interactions.
Published 2020“…<p>For each drug concentration combination, we tested whether the degree of synergy is significantly different from zero (i.e., independent drug interaction). …”
-
77
-
78
Robustness and endogeneity tests.
Published 2024“…Firstly, our findings reveal that more frequent interaction leads to better stock liquidity, and this result remains consistent across various robustness tests. …”
-
79
-
80