The RPL estimation results in the main effect with interaction (Model 2) (Only significant variables). by Keiko Aoki (10535562)

Significant marginal variants identified from MAginal ePIstasis Test (MAPIT). by Adam N. Spierer (10325544)

Numbers of stage 1 significant variants. by Michael Francis (287202)

“…Significance was assessed for both 1df interaction terms and 2df joint terms. …”

T-test results of the groups’ learning achievement delayed post-test scores. by Seda Aktı Aslan (22582232)

Subjects:

Summary of 4-way ANOVA statistical tests presenting results for the four main factors and any significant interactions between factors. by Laura Weber (3729010)

“…<p>Summary of 4-way ANOVA statistical tests presenting results for the four main factors and any significant interactions between factors.…”

<i>Slc22a23</i> knockout rats showed a small but significant difference in the social interaction test. by Yasuhiro Uchimura (8796239)

Average contact force and percentage of strong contact force under different conditions: (a) different particle shapes, (b) different particle sizes. by Yongfeng Zhu (7361045)

Reaction force test device. by Yanming Su (18548045)

Robustness test. by Chengzhe Li (17869232)

T-test Results of the groups’ self-directed learning skill post-test scores. by Seda Aktı Aslan (22582232)

Subjects:

T-test results: Effects of school interventions on girls’ social interactions. by Fisseha A. Andargie (21192270)

Force and displacement in sandstone uniform loading. by Tong Zhuang (17847113)

Hyperplasia of the suboccipital muscles significantly increased intracranial pressure. by Chan Li (433717)

Subjects:

Significance of each parameter on power. by Molly A. Hall (8144409)

Estimation and significance testing of cross-correlation between environmental parameters with positive time-lags. by Edgart Flores (16907557)

Stacked Manhattan plots of genome-wide significant SNPs. by Boxi Lin (14440390)

“…The −log₁₀ <i>p</i>-values (with further log₁₀ transformation on y-axis to aid presentation) are shown for the five association methods, including <i>T</i>_{<i>Female</i>} (Female-only analysis), <i>T</i>_<i>Male</i> (Male-only analysis), <i>T</i>_<i>Diff</i> (SNP-sex interaction-only test), <i>T</i>_{1,<i>metaL</i>} (the traditional sex-combined meta-analysis), and <i>T</i>_{2,<i>metaQ</i>} (the omnibus meta-analysis); see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011221#pgen.1011221.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for method details. …”

Stacked Manhattan plots of genome-wide significant SNPs. by Boxi Lin (14440390)

“…The −log₁₀ <i>p</i>-values (with further log₁₀ transformation on y-axis to aid presentation) are shown for the five association methods, including <i>T</i>_{<i>Female</i>} (Female-only analysis), <i>T</i>_<i>Male</i> (Male-only analysis), <i>T</i>_<i>Diff</i> (SNP-sex interaction-only test), <i>T</i>_{1,<i>metaL</i>} (the traditional sex-combined meta-analysis), and <i>T</i>_{2,<i>metaQ</i>} (the omnibus meta-analysis); see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011221#pgen.1011221.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for method details. …”

Significance (Fisher’s exact test) of RBP binds to promoters of genes targeted by nuclear lncRNAs bound by the RBP that interacts with promoter RBP. by Saumya Agrawal (3441386)

“…<p>Significance (Fisher’s exact test) of RBP binds to promoters of genes targeted by nuclear lncRNAs bound by the RBP that interacts with promoter RBP.…”

Power to detect significant interactions at two significance thresholds across varying sample sizes and true proportions of phenotypic variance explained (PVE) by the interaction. by Luke M. Evans (2910047)

Results for vertical ground reaction force (VGRF). by Eric Yung-Sheng Su (13015474)

Subjects: