Downregulation of miR-1247-3p inhibited apoptosis and reduced chemosensitivity in cells. by Dequan Wang (6007007)

Subjects:

Mod localizes both within and outside the nucleolus in NBs. by Amalia S. Parra (4173004)

Subjects:

miR-1247-3p was downregulated in tissues of patients with CRC and was associated with prognosis and drug resistance. by Dequan Wang (6007007)

Subjects:

Effect of supplementation of oocyte maturation medium (OMM) with follicular fluid (FF) from small or large follicles on development of embryos to the blastocyst stage. by Verónica M. Negrón-Pérez (20691412)

Particle size distribution of GO-GA NPs. by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of GA (black), GO (blue), and GO–GA NPs (red). by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Toxicity of GO and GO-GA NPs on <i>C. maculatus</i> adults after 24h exposure. by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Mean persistence (±SE) of GO and GO-GA NPs on <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i> by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Post-effect of GO and GO-GA NPs on progeny production of <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i> by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Transmission electron micrographs of GA NPs (a) and GO-GA NPs (b). by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Particle size distribution, PDI, and zeta potential of GO-GA NPs. by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

PT₅₀ values of GO and GO-GA NPs against <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i> by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Mortality of <i>C. maculatus</i> after 24h exposure to GO and GO-GA NPs. by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

Volatile constituents of Garlic essential oil identified by GC-MS. by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

GC-MS chromatogram of garlic essential oil. by Huda H. Elbehery (22492996)

Subjects:

S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Outcomes and interventions by group comparison. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”