Primary and secondary efficacy end points (intention-to-treat population). by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants at baseline. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Change in QIDS-SR-16 and MBI-HSS-MP by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Change in Demoralization Scale (DSII) by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Table 1_Effects of grassland degradation on soil ecological stoichiometry and soil microbial community on the South of the Greater Khingan Mountains.docx by Yuyu Li (3939137)

“…Grassland degradation significantly decreased soil bacterial and fungal richness. …”

Effects of pre-medication and warming device on systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressures in dogs following pre-medication, induction and inhalant anesthesi... by Jacob P. Rastas (20642173)

Subjects:

Change in rectal temperature following pre-medication, induction and inhalant anesthesia. by Jacob P. Rastas (20642173)

Subjects:

Effects of pre-medication and warming device on heart rate (HR) assessed by pulse oximetry in dogs following pre-medication, induction and inhalant anesthesia. by Jacob P. Rastas (20642173)

Subjects:

S1 File - by Jacob P. Rastas (20642173)

Subjects:

Times to tracheal extubation, sternal recumbency and standing (minutes) following inhalant anesthesia and final rectal temperatures (°C) in each premedication-treatment group. by Jacob P. Rastas (20642173)

Subjects:

AVAcore placement. by Jacob P. Rastas (20642173)

Subjects:

S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Outcomes and interventions by group comparison. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”