Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
-
203
-
204
-
205
-
206
-
207
S1 File -
Published 2025“…Despite the prevalence and severity of sleep disturbances during opioid withdrawal, there is a gap in our understanding of their interactions. …”
-
208
SHAP dependence plots with interaction coloring.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. …”
-
209
Screening process diagram.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. …”
-
210
SHAP waterfall plot.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. …”
-
211
SHAP decision plot.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. …”
-
212
LASSO regression visualization plot.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. …”
-
213
SHAP dependence plots.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. …”
-
214
Tertile stratified subgroup analysis.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. …”
-
215
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…While mean respiratory rate was not affected, midazolam resulted in a significant decrease in both VRR (ß = −0.071, 95% CI: −0.120 to −0.021) and VTV (ß = −0.117, 95% CI: −0.170 to −0.062). …”
-
216
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
217
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
218
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
219
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
220
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”