<i>Leptospira interrogans</i> from Okinawa induces epithelial barrier disruption with different kinetics. by Tetsuya Kakita (4922584)

Comparison with Existing Studies. by Na Zhao (112953)

“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”

Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup. by Na Zhao (112953)

“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”

UCS texts data. by Na Zhao (112953)

“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”

S1 File - by Ingmar Lundquist (46422)

“…Additionally, the significance of extracellular NO on GSIS was studied. …”

Transcriptome analysis of Δ<i>pbpp6</i> and WT <i>P. berghei</i> gametocytes. by Yonghui Feng (12227596)

Phosphoproteomic analysis of Δ<i>pbpp6</i> and WT <i>P. berghei</i> gametocytes. by Yonghui Feng (12227596)

Quantification of phosphosites of Δ<i>pbpp6</i> parasites at gametocyte stages. by Yonghui Feng (12227596)

Global transcriptional analysis for activated gametocytes of Δ<i>pbpp6</i> parasites by RNA-seq. by Yonghui Feng (12227596)

Amplitude for A/L = 0.29. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Top view of the experimental setup. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Amplitude for A/L = 0.338. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Parameters of energy harvesting. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G_y = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Amplitude for A/L = 0.02. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Graph for maximum Frequency at G_y = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Graph for maximum Power at G_y = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Amplitude for A/L = 0.03. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Summary of experimentation results. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Piezoelectric eel. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”