بدائل البحث:
significant protective » significant positive (توسيع البحث), significant potential (توسيع البحث), significant proteomic (توسيع البحث)
protective decrease » progressive decrease (توسيع البحث)
gap decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث), gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant protective » significant positive (توسيع البحث), significant potential (توسيع البحث), significant proteomic (توسيع البحث)
protective decrease » progressive decrease (توسيع البحث)
gap decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث), gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Variables and generalized linear mixed models to explore PICS-F impairments.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Table 2 -
منشور في 2024"…Additionally, it will likely highlight significant trends in risk and protective factors, such as the dual role of academic achievement—both as a risk and protective factor—and the impact of family-based interventions. …"
-
14
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
15
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
16
Sample attribute table.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
17
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
18
Sample scenario description.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
19
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
20
Methodological flowchart.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"