Showing 1 - 20 results of 4,944 for search '(( significant gap decrease ) OR ( significantly ((mean decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index. by Søren Egstrand (10906087)

    Published 2025
    “…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Evogliptin attenuates the phenotypic switch of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the osteogenesis-associated genes <i>in-vitro.</i> by Razia Rashid Rahil (22772495)

    Published 2025
    “…Results are presented as mean ± SD. Ceramide: CER, Evogliptin: EVO. *(P < 0.05) significant vs. control group; <sup>$</sup>(P < 0.05) significant vs. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  20. 20