Search alternatives:
significantly impact » significant impact (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 4,731 for search '(( significant gap decrease ) OR ( significantly impact decrease ))', query time: 0.29s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Frequency of tobacco smoking among smokers.

    Frequency of tobacco smoking among smokers. by Prasanna Herath (20714794)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Correlation of lung function parameters with smoking variables.

    Correlation of lung function parameters with smoking variables. by Prasanna Herath (20714794)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Anthropometric characteristics of smokers and non-smokers.

    Anthropometric characteristics of smokers and non-smokers. by Prasanna Herath (20714794)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Respiratory clinical characteristics of smokers and non-smokers.

    Respiratory clinical characteristics of smokers and non-smokers. by Prasanna Herath (20714794)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Effect of the smoking factor on lung function parameters (FVC, FEV1, PEF, FEF 25_75).

    Effect of the smoking factor on lung function parameters (FVC, FEV1, PEF, FEF 25_75). by Prasanna Herath (20714794)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Lung function parameters between smokers and non-smokers.

    Lung function parameters between smokers and non-smokers. by Prasanna Herath (20714794)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Sample attribute table.

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Sample scenario description.

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Methodological flowchart.

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    S8 File -

    S8 File - by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Study populations of included studies.

    Study populations of included studies. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Future research directions.

    Future research directions. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    PRISMA flow diagram.

    PRISMA flow diagram. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    S9 File -

    S9 File - by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    S7 File -

    S7 File - by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: