Search alternatives:
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
6981
-
6982
CONSORT Flowchart of Participants.
Published 2025“…The intervention group showed significantly reduced weight (median; baseline 1, post-intervention 0.975, follow-up 0.983, p < 0.001), and slightly reduced waist circumference (median; baseline 1, post-intervention 0.975, follow-up 0.975, p = 0.226); however, the control group showed no change. …”
-
6983
-
6984
-
6985
-
6986
-
6987
Image 1_Association of inflammatory biomarkers with new functional morbidity at hospital discharge in children who survive severe sepsis.pdf
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>New functional morbidity occurred in 38 children (32%) and was associated with increased plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, sIL-2Ra, MCP1, IL-8 (CXCL8), sIL-1RII, IL-10, MIP1a, and IL-2r and decreased RANTES (CCL5) (p < .001) at all three timepoints. …”
-
6988
-
6989
-
6990
-
6991
-
6992
-
6993
-
6994
-
6995
-
6996
Characteristics of specialists at day centers.
Published 2025“…The intervention group showed significantly reduced weight (median; baseline 1, post-intervention 0.975, follow-up 0.983, p < 0.001), and slightly reduced waist circumference (median; baseline 1, post-intervention 0.975, follow-up 0.975, p = 0.226); however, the control group showed no change. …”
-
6997
-
6998
-
6999
-
7000
The Dataset used for Tables 1 and 3.
Published 2025“…The intervention group showed significantly reduced weight (median; baseline 1, post-intervention 0.975, follow-up 0.983, p < 0.001), and slightly reduced waist circumference (median; baseline 1, post-intervention 0.975, follow-up 0.975, p = 0.226); however, the control group showed no change. …”