Search alternatives:
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
221
Table 3_The impact of teacher care on teacher-student relationship: evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal data.xls
Published 2025“…Study 1 found that there was a significant positive correlation between teacher gender, parental perceived teacher care and teacher-student relationship. …”
-
222
Table1_Age and gender influence on clinical manifestations of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: a case series of 2479 Chinese patients.xlsx
Published 2024“…Age and gender have an impact on the presentation and severity of TAO.…”
-
223
Table 1_Gender difference in the association between composite dietary antioxidant index and all-cause mortality.docx
Published 2025“…The restricted cubic spline revealed that the hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality decreased significantly with increasing CDAI. However, this negative association existed only when the CDAI was less than 5. …”
-
224
Percentage trends in intimate partner sexual violence against women by survey year.
Published 2025Subjects: -
225
-
226
-
227
-
228
-
229
Table 1_TikTok fitspiration and fitness ideal internalisation: gender differences in self-esteem and body satisfaction.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Paired-samples t-tests revealed a significant decrease in body satisfaction post-exposure (p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.47), while state self-esteem remained unchanged (p = 0.354, Cohen’s d = 0.023). …”
-
230
-
231
-
232
-
233
-
234
-
235
-
236
-
237
-
238
-
239
-
240
Demographics of the study population.
Published 2024“…However, there was no significant difference in OBH between the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>p</i> > 0.05). …”