Showing 2,581 - 2,600 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant gender decrease ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 2581
  2. 2582
  3. 2583
  4. 2584
  5. 2585
  6. 2586
  7. 2587
  8. 2588
  9. 2589
  10. 2590
  11. 2591

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  12. 2592

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  13. 2593

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  14. 2594

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  15. 2595

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  16. 2596

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  17. 2597

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  18. 2598

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  19. 2599
  20. 2600