Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
Characteristics of study participants in women according to frailty groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
67
-
68
Distribution of responses to vital signs.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
-
69
Survey tool development process.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
-
70
Respondent characteristics.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
-
71
S1 Graphical abstract -
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Our analysis showed a significant decrease in mortality from paroxysmal tachycardia since 1999, although there has been a slight increase in recent years. …”
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
78
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
79
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
80
Demographics by Country and Gender.
Published 2025“…Regarding creative self-efficacy, we found gender-specific impacts, with male participants experiencing a decrease, contrary to our expectations. …”