Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
decrease reverse » decreased levels (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
decrease reverse » decreased levels (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
Table_1_Gender Difference in Gender Bias: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Male’s Gender Stereotypes.DOCX
Published 2019“…The reduction in male participants’ gender bias mainly resulted from a decrease in the difference in reaction time (RT) between congruent and incongruent blocks. …”
-
144
Table_1_Gender Difference in Gender Bias: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Male’s Gender Stereotypes.DOCX
Published 2019“…The reduction in male participants’ gender bias mainly resulted from a decrease in the difference in reaction time (RT) between congruent and incongruent blocks. …”
-
145
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
146
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
147
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
148
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
149
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
150
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
151
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
152
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
-
157
-
158
-
159
Reversible Adsorption and Interfacial Photoisomerization of Azobenzene Surfactants Studied by QCM
Published 2025“…Using quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) measurements, we show that the interfacial mass change is governed by the isomeric composition in the bulk solution: the <i>trans</i> isomer exhibits strong adsorption, while the <i>cis</i> isomer is significantly less surface-active. We further quantify the photoisomerization kinetics at the interface, revealing that the isomerization rate constant decreases with a lower <i>trans</i> isomer concentration due to a transition from a diffuse multilayer to a confined double-layer structure. …”
-
160