Search alternatives:
significant gene » significant genes (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
inter decrease » water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant gene » significant genes (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
inter decrease » water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
Significant major depression candidate risk genes for three gene-based methods (MAGMA, eMAGMA, S-PrediXcan).
Published 2019“…<p>Significant major depression candidate risk genes for three gene-based methods (MAGMA, eMAGMA, S-PrediXcan).…”
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
Larger SNV-to-gene mappings (by coverage) yield more significant genes.
Published 2022“…<p><b>(A)</b> The number of significant genes detected for diverse SNV-to-gene mappings as a function of their coverage (that is, the number of non-redundant base pairs covered by all features–gene bodies, flanks, and regulatory elements—defining a gene, summed across all genes). …”
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80
Based on Kruskal-Wallis test no significant correlation between the gene expression and gene across categories of groups (p>0.005).
Published 2024“…<p>Based on Kruskal-Wallis test no significant correlation between the gene expression and gene across categories of groups (p>0.005).…”