Search alternatives:
significant greater » significantly greater (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant broader (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant greater » significantly greater (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant broader (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
481
-
482
-
483
Flowchart of the study.
Published 2024“…At species level, <i>Schaalia</i> spp., <i>Streptococcus gordonii</i>, and <i>Leptotrichia wadei</i> increased in Placebo and decreased in the Probiotic group after treatment. <i>Granulicatella adiacens</i> decreased significantly after the probiotic therapy, while <i>Saccharibacteria</i> (TM7) spp., <i>Solobacterium moorei</i>, and <i>Catonella morbi</i> increased significantly. …”
-
484
-
485
Baseline characteristics of mother–infant pairs by child mortality status (N = 11,519).
Published 2025Subjects: -
486
Child mortality rate per 1,000 person-years during the 18-month follow-up period.
Published 2025Subjects: -
487
Kaplan–Meier cumulative survival curve for infants exposed and not exposed to HIV.
Published 2025Subjects: -
488
-
489
-
490
Sex differences and percentage change trends in smoking-attributable RA burden from 1990 to 2021.
Published 2025Subjects: -
491
-
492
-
493
Burden of RA attributable to smoking in 2021 across 204 countries and territories.
Published 2025Subjects: -
494
-
495
-
496
-
497
Figure 3 from A Cost-Effective Two-Step Approach for Multi-Cancer Early Detection in High-Risk Populations
Published 2025“…<p>Outcome of the two-step MCED approach in the case–control study. In the case–control cohort, the two-step MCED approach significantly improved specificity from 91.0% to 99.3%, whereas sensitivity decreased from 49.9% to 39.9%. …”
-
498
-
499
-
500