Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for body measurements as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein calves (n =... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for ether extract intake (g/d) as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein cal... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for starter intake (g/d), body weight (kg), average daily gain (g/d), and feed efficiency (g/g) as influenced by feeding pasteuri... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for eating time (min/8-h) and sorting index (%) on sieve 2.36 mm and bottom pan as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

BMI versus change in soft tissue thickness in hydrated to dehydrated state. by Fatemeh Khorami (22041563)

Raw data. by Changzhi Liu (518454)

“…The incidence of fractures was significantly greater among participants with low RC levels than among those with high RC levels (6.4% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.01). …”

Baseline characteristics of the subjects. by Changzhi Liu (518454)

“…The incidence of fractures was significantly greater among participants with low RC levels than among those with high RC levels (6.4% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.01). …”

The incidence of grooming is most influenced by the addition of an opaque divider, as compared to manipulanda. by Matthew D. Boulanger (22600966)

GO and KEGG analysis of DEPs. by Huiyang Jia (14444661)

MO-SAM segmentation performance using the Grid method in arid/semi-arid landscape. by Qitong Wang (15279695)

MO-SAM segmentation performance using the Grid method in the forested landscape. by Qitong Wang (15279695)

Ranking position of feature importance for each cluster in the post-vaccination period. by Jéssica Villar (21453137)

Ranking position of feature importance for each cluster in the pre-vaccination period. by Jéssica Villar (21453137)

SHAP Values per cluster in the pre-vaccination period show each feature’s importance on COVID-19 mortality. by Jéssica Villar (21453137)

SHAP Values per cluster in the post-vaccination period show each feature’s importance on COVID-19 mortality. by Jéssica Villar (21453137)