Search alternatives:
significant group » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
group decrease » group decreased (Expand Search), groups decreased (Expand Search)
significant group » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
group decrease » group decreased (Expand Search), groups decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Analysis of ucfDNA in DHSs between control and age-comparable bladder cancer groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
7
-
8
Fold changes were calculated as mean condition B/mean condition A, after mTIC normalization.
Published 2021Subjects: -
9
-
10
Correlations of Lnc THRIL and MiR 125b with study parameters among UC patients.
Published 2022Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Correlations of Lnc THRIL and MiR 125b with study parameters among CD patients.
Published 2022Subjects: -
15
-
16
Supplemental Figure 2: Fold change of HOX genes in NULL compared to WT. Red dots indicate statistically significant increase.
Published 2022“…<p>Fold change increases of Hox genes are compared between NULL and WT groups in the aortic root. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20