Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the LVEDD in the experiment group compared with the control group. by Ziyi Li (349831)

Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the LVESD in the experiment group compared with the control group. by Ziyi Li (349831)

Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the CER in the experiment group compared with the control group. by Ziyi Li (349831)

Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the LVEF in the experiment group compared with the control group. by Ziyi Li (349831)

Forest plots showing a significant improvement in the BNP in the experiment group compared with the control group. by Ziyi Li (349831)

Changes in FMD (% ± SD) in patient subgroup with decreased body weight during observation period. by Haruka Tamura (153793)

Spleen PAX5 significantly decreased in APRIL/BLyS blockade treated mice. by Natalie M. Bath (6316517)

The heart rate was similar among the groups. by Hongyu Li (1332669)

Subjects:

Correlation matrix of liver weight and metabolites identified as most significant in distinguishing the 2 liver weight group. by Bara Lo (10133624)

Significant GO terms enriched based on the DEGs in control vs. noise groups. by Guangwei Ma (8503014)

Significant GO terms enriched based on the DEGs in control vs. noise groups. by Guangwei Ma (8503014)

Significant KEGG pathways enriched based on the DEGs in control vs. noise groups. by Guangwei Ma (8503014)

The significantly altered bacteria between stress group and control group. by Durga Paudel (12635367)

“…<p>(a) The LEfSe analysis for the LDA score showed alterations in 10 different OTUs between the two groups. (b) The relative abundance of <i>Facklamia</i> (at the genus level) was significantly increased, while that of <i>Corynebacterium</i> (at the genus level) was significantly decreased in the stress group when compared to those in the control groups (*p < 0.05; Welch’s t-test).…”

The decreased performances (in percentage) in VR (results of the whole-body visualization) for both age groups. by Stefan Pastel (9401998)

Large-scale results from GPN, HPN, GPN+2opt, and HPN+2opt demonstrate that the gap between our model and GPN increases as the problem size increases. by Ahmed Stohy (11836376)

Distribution of continuous variables of all 3 visits of group 1 (placebo) and group 2 (placebo) that have no significant difference among the groups. by Nattapon Riengvirodkij (11268720)

Subjects:

S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

Participant enrollment. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”