Search alternatives:
significant groups » significant group (Expand Search), significant gradual (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant groups » significant group (Expand Search), significant gradual (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
21
Eight urinary metabolites exhibited significant changes in the MSG-treated groups at week 12, and MSG-withdrawal group at weeks 0, 4, 8, 10, and 12.
Published 2024“…The statistical significance between groups was assessed using one-way ANOVA, and significance within withdrawal group between with and without MSG consumption was determined using the paired t-test (p < 0.05). …”
-
22
Comparison of the statistical significance between t-tests with C<sub>1</sub> = 40 and CTOT with C<sub>1</sub> = 32.
Published 2022“…The inset Venn diagram illustrates statistically significant differences of levels of circulating microRNAs between control and treated groups, applying the CTOT, MC, or CO method and a maximum quality cycle threshold of C<sub>1</sub> = 32 to the data reported by Silva et al. …”
-
23
Genes significantly affected by deletion of <i>ryfA</i>.
Published 2021“…(<b>B</b>) Genes classified in different categories based on log2 fold-change difference. Genes upregulated (yellow rectangles) and downregulated (blue rectangles) by at least 1.7-fold were considered significant with P < 0.05. …”
-
24
Pre-match open aortic group.
Published 2023“…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
-
25
Pre-match CABG/Valve group.
Published 2023“…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
-
26
-
27
Image_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF
Published 2020“…Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distance showed no significant (P > 0.05) difference in the overall rumen prokaryotic microbiota profiles among the four calf groups, and principal component analysis (PCA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity showed no significant (P > 0.05) difference in functional features predicted from the detected taxa. …”
-
28
-
29
<i>HLA-DQB1/DQA2</i> rs9274619:A significantly interacts with T2D on triglycerides.
Published 2022Subjects: -
30
-
31
Propensity-score matched open aortic group.
Published 2023“…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
-
32
Propensity-score matched CABG/Valve group.
Published 2023“…There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). …”
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40
Data_Sheet_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.docx
Published 2020“…Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distance showed no significant (P > 0.05) difference in the overall rumen prokaryotic microbiota profiles among the four calf groups, and principal component analysis (PCA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity showed no significant (P > 0.05) difference in functional features predicted from the detected taxa. …”