Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant 17 (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant 17 (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
19141
Table 2_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19142
Table 10_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19143
Table 3_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19144
Table 8_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19145
Table 6_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19146
Table 5_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19147
Table 4_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19148
Table 7_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
Published 2024“…In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares [odds ratio (OR) = 2.90 95% CI 1.70–4.95, p < 0.001] and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years). …”
-
19149
Image2_GABA Type A receptors expressed in triple negative breast cancer cells mediate chloride ion flux.TIF
Published 2024“…GABA<sub>A</sub> β3 subunit knockdown causes cell cycle arrest in TNBC cell lines via decreased cyclin D1 and increased p21 expression. However, it is not known if the upregulated GABA<sub>A</sub>R express at the cell-surface in TNBC and mediate Cl<sup>−</sup> flux. …”
-
19150
Image 9_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19151
Image 8_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19152
Image 5_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19153
Image 2_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19154
Image 3_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19155
Image 4_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19156
Image 11_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19157
Image 10_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19158
Image 7_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19159
Image 6_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
19160
Correlation analyses between studied genes.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Our study is the first to detect decreased <i>NEAT-1</i> and <i>miR374b-5p</i> expression in COVID-19 patients’ serum. …”