Showing 381 - 400 results of 18,300 for search '(( significant impact decrease ) OR ( significant ((shape decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.58s Refine Results
  1. 381

    S7 File - by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…We performed a systematic review of studies assessing the impact of exercise interventions on validated hepatic outcomes in children with NAFLD.…”
  2. 382

    Participant characteristics of included studies. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…We performed a systematic review of studies assessing the impact of exercise interventions on validated hepatic outcomes in children with NAFLD.…”
  3. 383
  4. 384
  5. 385
  6. 386

    Raw data. by Saeedeh Abbasi (9423189)

    Published 2025
    “…However, both groups exhibited a significant decrease in CCI during prolonged standing (time *  condition: p =  0.003). …”
  7. 387

    Data. by Saeedeh Abbasi (9423189)

    Published 2025
    “…However, both groups exhibited a significant decrease in CCI during prolonged standing (time *  condition: p =  0.003). …”
  8. 388
  9. 389

    Model A: Logistic structural model. by Abigail A. Lee (19935335)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Latent variables concerning logistical factors and covariates were combined into a structural model. SEM was used to determine which factors impact parental intent to vaccinate their children against HPV as well as HPV vaccination hesitancy. …”
  10. 390
  11. 391
  12. 392
  13. 393
  14. 394
  15. 395
  16. 396
  17. 397
  18. 398

    Schema of the experimental procedure. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

    Published 2024
    “…While learning effects may have negated the impact of mental fatigue across the 5 experimental blocks, a significant decrease in performance was observed within blocks. …”
  19. 399

    Source data - by Desheng Xie (21439869)

    Published 2025
    “…The results indicate that: 1) Vegetation cover in the affected regions decreased from 0.43 to 0.38 between 2017 and 2024, with Fire Zone 1 showing minimal recovery and Fire Zone 3 exhibiting moderate improvement, though the overall low vegetation area expanded due to ongoing fires; 2) The Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) declined from 0.41 to 0.38, with poor-rated areas increasing significantly, particularly in Fire Zone 3, reflecting the ongoing degradation of ecological conditions caused by both fire activity and climate factors; 3) The Flat Spectral Shape Index (FSSI) showed stability, but fluctuations in the areas with moderate and high probability of exposed coal, especially in Fire Zone 3, pointed to the expanding fire footprint and worsening ecological degradation; 4) Surface subsidence varied considerably, with Fire Zone 3 experiencing the most severe subsidence, indicating unstable geological conditions exacerbated by fire activity. …”
  20. 400