Linear relationships (Spearman’s r (p-value)) the treatment-induced changes in clinical and neurophysiological data. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

The demographical and clinical characteristics of subjects at baseline. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

Electrode montage and electric field distribution simulated with SimNIBS software. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

Subjects:

Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”

Regional differences in percentage changes of N07BA drug prescribing rates during the pandemic. by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Hypnotic and sedative (N05C) prescribing changes from 2014 to 2022. by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Regional differences in percentage changes of N05B prescribing rates during the pandemic. by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Drugs used in alcohol dependence (N07BB) prescribing changes from 2014 to 2022 (females). by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Regional differences in percentage changes of N05C prescribing rates during the pandemic. by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Regional differences in percentage changes of N06A prescribing rates during the pandemic. by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Drugs used in addictive disorders (N07B) prescribing changes from 2014 to 2022. by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Anxiolytic (N05B) prescribing changes from 2014 to 2022. by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects:

Drugs used in alcohol dependence (N07BB) prescribing changes from 2014 to 2022 (both genders). by Dainty Ei (22265317)

Subjects: