Showing 261 - 280 results of 7,623 for search '(( significant impact decrease ) OR ( significantly ((lower decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.41s Refine Results
  1. 261
  2. 262
  3. 263
  4. 264
  5. 265
  6. 266

    Impact test procedure on panel. by Tek Raj Gyawali (20550560)

    Published 2025
    “…Panels reinforced with thinner PVA fibers exhibited superior performance in resisting compressive and impact loads. This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
  7. 267

    Average days to heal a wound in 2022 and 2023. by Heba Tallah Mohammed (2822432)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Average healing time for all wounds decreased significantly from 62.5 days in 2022 to 38.6 days in 2023, a 38.2% improvement (p < 0.001). …”
  8. 268
  9. 269
  10. 270
  11. 271
  12. 272
  13. 273
  14. 274
  15. 275
  16. 276
  17. 277

    Descriptive statistics and variable definitions. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  18. 278

    The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  19. 279

    Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  20. 280

    S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”