Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
Showing 1,721 - 1,740 results of 7,906 for search '(( significant impact decrease ) OR ( significantly ((mean decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ))', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 1721

    Mortality rates per lifecycle stage [28]. by Albertus Constantijn Sloof (20405090)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Findings</p><p>Results indicate that emergency vaccination could significantly mitigate the impact of a CHIKV outbreak. …”
  2. 1722
  3. 1723
  4. 1724
  5. 1725
  6. 1726
  7. 1727
  8. 1728
  9. 1729
  10. 1730
  11. 1731

    Markov model. by Yiping An (20609789)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  12. 1732
  13. 1733
  14. 1734
  15. 1735
  16. 1736
  17. 1737

    Descriptive statistics and variable definitions. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  18. 1738

    The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  19. 1739

    Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  20. 1740

    S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”