Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1981
-
1982
-
1983
-
1984
Baseline and Post-Treatment Results of Echocardiographic Variables in Each Experimental Group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1985
-
1986
-
1987
-
1988
-
1989
Baseline and Post-Treatment Serum Cytokine Levels in Each Investigational Group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1990
Relative abundance of microbiota in colonic content at the genus level (n = 5).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1991
Baseline and Post-Treatment Serum Levels of NT-proBNP in Each Investigational Group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1992
Variables obtained from the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire in each experimental group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1993
-
1994
Potential metabolites in the colonic tissue related with diarrhea induced by FSE.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1995
-
1996
Heatmap and pathway analysis of the potential metabolites in colon tissue related with diarrhea.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1997
-
1998
Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
1999
Pseudo code for coupling model execution process.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
2000
Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”