Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1641
Dynamic Tracking of <i>In Vivo</i> Receptor Availability in Tumor Using Paired-Agent Imaging
Published 2025Subjects: -
1642
Dynamic Tracking of <i>In Vivo</i> Receptor Availability in Tumor Using Paired-Agent Imaging
Published 2025Subjects: -
1643
-
1644
-
1645
-
1646
-
1647
-
1648
-
1649
-
1650
-
1651
-
1652
-
1653
-
1654
-
1655
Characteristics of study participants in women according to frailty groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1656
-
1657
-
1658
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
1659
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
1660
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”