Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
-
701
Effects on cooling air mass flow rate.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
702
3D model and section view of E3 NGV.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
703
Conditions for uncertainty analyses.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
704
Scheme for mesh convergence study.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
705
3-D printed NGV specimen.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
706
Relative error bar of surface temperature.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
707
Effect on the NGV leading edge temperature.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
708
Schematic of the test equipment.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
709
-
710
-
711
-
712
-
713
-
714
A schematic view of ACS.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
715
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
716
Shows the amount of emission reductions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
717
Comparison COP of our study with Florides et al.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
718
Effect of generator temperature on COP.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
719
Emission factors.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
720
Magnitude of emission reduction.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”