Showing 2,901 - 2,920 results of 19,650 for search '(( significant increase decrease ) OR ( significant ((non decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))*', query time: 0.70s Refine Results
  1. 2901
  2. 2902

    ERI Thresholds Between Adjacent Zones. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

    Published 2025
    “…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
  3. 2903

    Location of the study area. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

    Published 2025
    “…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
  4. 2904

    Random Forest structure with cross-validation. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

    Published 2025
    “…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
  5. 2905

    Land use change from 1990 to 2020. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

    Published 2025
    “…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
  6. 2906

    Geographic data. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

    Published 2025
    “…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
  7. 2907

    Classification accuracy. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

    Published 2025
    “…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
  8. 2908

    S1 Data - by Richard Junior Zapata Dongo (17912565)

    Published 2025
    “…This interaction was further supported by a significant decrease of ALK phosphorylation in single and combination treatment with 300nM ABT-199. …”
  9. 2909

    NPF-NPFR pathway in LNd-LPN feedback circuit fine-tune cooling induced locomotion increase. by Xin Yuan (174619)

    Published 2024
    “…Data (G, J, M, P) were analyzed with Welch’s one-way ANOVA (letters a, b denote significance, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Data (F, I, L, O) were quantified with paired <i>t</i> test. …”
  10. 2910

    Sample distribution of mergers and non-mergers. by Yi Zhang (9093)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparative analyses of financial performance trends between mergers and non-mergers in similar sectors revealed that M&As often decrease financial performance scores of mergers compared with non-mergers. …”
  11. 2911
  12. 2912
  13. 2913
  14. 2914

    Fig 2 - by Maryann S. Watson (16879881)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  15. 2915

    Fig 6 - by Maryann S. Watson (16879881)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  16. 2916

    Fig 4 - by Maryann S. Watson (16879881)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  17. 2917
  18. 2918

    Fig 1 - by Maryann S. Watson (16879881)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  19. 2919

    Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…Empirical models for the relationships between the investigated plant traits and PD/DVP were created using linear regression analysis preceded by a lack-of-fit test. An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  20. 2920

    Estimated mean values for light interception. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…Empirical models for the relationships between the investigated plant traits and PD/DVP were created using linear regression analysis preceded by a lack-of-fit test. An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”