Showing 101 - 120 results of 249 for search '(( significant increase decrease ) OR ( significant ((non decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 101

    CweL trial design. by Stanley Carries (21172287)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to controls, there was a non-significant increase in psychological wellbeing (β = 3.14, <i>p = </i>0.319). …”
  2. 102

    Participant Flow. by Stanley Carries (21172287)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to controls, there was a non-significant increase in psychological wellbeing (β = 3.14, <i>p = </i>0.319). …”
  3. 103

    Economic cost composition by arm and outcomes. by Stanley Carries (21172287)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to controls, there was a non-significant increase in psychological wellbeing (β = 3.14, <i>p = </i>0.319). …”
  4. 104
  5. 105
  6. 106
  7. 107

    Loxoprofen or SB225002 administration attenuated inflammatory pain in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-injected mice exposed to sound stress. by Satoka Kasai (3861115)

    Published 2025
    “…(A, B) The CFA-injected mice (CFA + saline) and CFA-injected mice with sound stress exposure (CFA + stress + loxoprofen) showed significantly increased response times to filament compared to the control (non-CFA) group (CFA + saline, 0 min, <sup>#</sup><sup>#</sup><sup>#</sup><sup>#</sup><i>P</i> < 0.0001; 30 min, <sup>#</sup><i>P</i> < 0.05; 60 min, <sup>#</sup><sup>#</sup><i>P</i> < 0.01; CFA + stress + saline, 0, 30, and 60 min, <sup>#</sup><sup>#</sup><sup>#</sup><sup>#</sup><i>P</i> < 0.0001). …”
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110

    Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…In an ordinal regression model BMI was a significant predictor (<i>B</i> = .10, <i>p</i> = .007) for increases in depression. …”
  11. 111

    Classification of hand grip strength. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…In an ordinal regression model BMI was a significant predictor (<i>B</i> = .10, <i>p</i> = .007) for increases in depression. …”
  12. 112

    Rating scale for functional severity [28]. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…In an ordinal regression model BMI was a significant predictor (<i>B</i> = .10, <i>p</i> = .007) for increases in depression. …”
  13. 113

    Regression model coefficients. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…In an ordinal regression model BMI was a significant predictor (<i>B</i> = .10, <i>p</i> = .007) for increases in depression. …”
  14. 114

    ICOPE screening positive participant’s responses. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…In an ordinal regression model BMI was a significant predictor (<i>B</i> = .10, <i>p</i> = .007) for increases in depression. …”
  15. 115

    WHO BMI classification for adults. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…In an ordinal regression model BMI was a significant predictor (<i>B</i> = .10, <i>p</i> = .007) for increases in depression. …”
  16. 116

    Cross-sectional dependence results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  17. 117

    Autocorrelation test results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  18. 118

    Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  19. 119

    Descriptive statistics of related variables. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  20. 120