Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1081
-
1082
-
1083
-
1084
-
1085
-
1086
-
1087
-
1088
Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes.
Published 2025“…In contrast, the non-recurrence group demonstrated significant and sustained improvement from 0.31 ± 0.25 preoperatively to 0.25 ± 0.25, 0.23 ± 0.26, 0.23 ± 0.28, 0.21 ± 0.27, 0.20 ± 0.30, and 0.16 ± 0.30 at corresponding postoperative time points (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g005" target="_blank">Fig 5</a>).…”
-
1089
Assignment of interventions to community health centers (CHCs) in districts.
Published 2024Subjects: -
1090
Estimated effects of the intervention packages on the incidence of NCDs metabolic risk factors.
Published 2024Subjects: -
1091
The difference in NCDs metabolic risk factors’ prevalence between the two surveys.
Published 2024Subjects: -
1092
-
1093
Demographic and economic characteristics of participants (frequencies and percentages).
Published 2024Subjects: -
1094
-
1095
Amplitude for A/L = 0.29.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1096
Top view of the experimental setup.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1097
Amplitude for A/L = 0.338.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1098
Parameters of energy harvesting.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1099
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1100
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
Published 2025“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”