Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
741
-
742
PRISMA flow chart of the screening process.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
743
Forest plot of liver function tests.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
744
Subgroup analysis of BUN based on pump type.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
745
Subgroup analysis of ICU Stay based on pump type.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
746
Subgroup analysis of eGFR based on pump type.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
747
GRADE evidence profile.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
748
Characteristics of included studies.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
749
Sensitivity analysis for eGFR.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
750
Sensitivity analysis for BUN.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
751
Subgroup analysis of BUN based on surgery type.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
752
Baseline Characteristics of Included Patients.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
753
Data for Fig 6D.
Published 2024“…In <i>vivo</i> experiments further showed that PRV UL4 (<sup>132</sup>DVAADAAAEAAAAE<sup>145</sup>) mutated strain (PRV-UL4<sup>mut</sup>) infection did not lead to a significant decrease in viral titers at 12 h. p. i, but it induced lower levels of IL-1β, IL-18, and GSDMD-NT, which led to an alleviated inflammatory infiltration and pathological damage in the lungs and brains, and a lower death rate compared with wild-type PRV strain infection. …”
-
754
Data for Fig 5D.
Published 2024“…In <i>vivo</i> experiments further showed that PRV UL4 (<sup>132</sup>DVAADAAAEAAAAE<sup>145</sup>) mutated strain (PRV-UL4<sup>mut</sup>) infection did not lead to a significant decrease in viral titers at 12 h. p. i, but it induced lower levels of IL-1β, IL-18, and GSDMD-NT, which led to an alleviated inflammatory infiltration and pathological damage in the lungs and brains, and a lower death rate compared with wild-type PRV strain infection. …”
-
755
Data for Figs 8A–8H, 9A–9K, 10A–10I.
Published 2024“…In <i>vivo</i> experiments further showed that PRV UL4 (<sup>132</sup>DVAADAAAEAAAAE<sup>145</sup>) mutated strain (PRV-UL4<sup>mut</sup>) infection did not lead to a significant decrease in viral titers at 12 h. p. i, but it induced lower levels of IL-1β, IL-18, and GSDMD-NT, which led to an alleviated inflammatory infiltration and pathological damage in the lungs and brains, and a lower death rate compared with wild-type PRV strain infection. …”
-
756
-
757
-
758
Implementation framework.
Published 2025“…HMIS data showed statistically significant improvement in data completeness (from 62 to 87% (p < 0.001)) and decreased error rate (from 37 to 18% (p < 0.001)) after completion of the coaching visit series. …”
-
759
-
760
DHIMS2 data quality over time.
Published 2025“…HMIS data showed statistically significant improvement in data completeness (from 62 to 87% (p < 0.001)) and decreased error rate (from 37 to 18% (p < 0.001)) after completion of the coaching visit series. …”