Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
12781
Baseline measures of participants.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Music Performance Anxiety, a subset of social anxiety disorder (SAD), can significantly impede the lives of professional voice users (PVUs). …”
-
12782
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Music Performance Anxiety, a subset of social anxiety disorder (SAD), can significantly impede the lives of professional voice users (PVUs). …”
-
12783
LC_MS/MS analysis for OGG1 interactomes.
Published 2024“…Importantly, inhibiting OGG1’s ability to recognize 8-oxoGua significantly decreases RSV progeny production. Our results underscore the viral replication machinery’s adaptation to oxidative challenges, suggesting that inhibiting OGG1’s reading function could be a novel strategy for antiviral intervention.…”
-
12784
Primer sequences for RT q-PCR.
Published 2024“…Importantly, inhibiting OGG1’s ability to recognize 8-oxoGua significantly decreases RSV progeny production. Our results underscore the viral replication machinery’s adaptation to oxidative challenges, suggesting that inhibiting OGG1’s reading function could be a novel strategy for antiviral intervention.…”
-
12785
Oligo sequences for EMSA and excision assay.
Published 2024“…Importantly, inhibiting OGG1’s ability to recognize 8-oxoGua significantly decreases RSV progeny production. Our results underscore the viral replication machinery’s adaptation to oxidative challenges, suggesting that inhibiting OGG1’s reading function could be a novel strategy for antiviral intervention.…”
-
12786
Disruption of OGG1-RNA interaction reduces RSV progeny production.
Published 2024“…<p>(A) OGG1 depletion, but not NEIL2 or MTH1, reduces RSV progeny yield. …”
-
12787
Data Sheet 1_A novel short-course, low-intensity blood-flow-restricted exercise (BFRE) regimen to study satellite cell function in critical illness survivors with sustained muscle...
Published 2025“…In controls, satellite cell content and MuRF1 transcript expression were significantly higher (1.53 ± 0.30- and 1.34 ± 0.31-fold difference, respectively) and myostatin transcript expression was significantly lower (0.58 ± 0.31-fold difference) in BFRE-trained versus untrained VL. …”
-
12788
-
12789
-
12790
-
12791
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12792
The analysis procedure.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12793
Rank of mutation fitness.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …”
-
12794
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12795
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12796
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12797
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12798
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12799
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
12800
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”