Showing 1 - 20 results of 1,009 for search '(( significant increase decrease ) OR ( significant attention dataset ))~', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    EMA attention mechanism working principle. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…We conducted ablation and comparative experiments on the public datasets RSOD and NWPU VHR-10. Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. …”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    PR comparison on RSOD dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…We conducted ablation and comparative experiments on the public datasets RSOD and NWPU VHR-10. Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. …”
  10. 10

    Ablation study on the RSOD dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…We conducted ablation and comparative experiments on the public datasets RSOD and NWPU VHR-10. Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Ablation study on the NWPU VHR-10 dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…We conducted ablation and comparative experiments on the public datasets RSOD and NWPU VHR-10. Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. …”
  13. 13

    PR comparison on NWPU VHR-10 dataset. by Pingping Yan (462509)

    Published 2025
    “…We conducted ablation and comparative experiments on the public datasets RSOD and NWPU VHR-10. Compared to YOLOv8, our approach achieved improvements of 7.6% and 2.8% in mAP@0.5, and increases of 2.1% and 1.1% in mAP@0.5:0.95. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15

    Comparison Results on CoNLL-2014 Dataset. by Yutong Liu (4027994)

    Published 2025
    “…The average edit distance decreases from 3.2 to 2.5, the BLEU score increases from 0.65 to 0.72, and the average processing time is reduced from 2.3 seconds to 1.8 seconds. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20