Search alternatives:
significant changes » significant challenge (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
significant changes » significant challenge (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
-
2281
-
2282
-
2283
-
2284
-
2285
-
2286
This is the data correction file.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The combined intervention significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and showed a trend towards reduced urine sodium excretion in hypertensive patients. …”
-
2287
Flow diagram of participants.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The combined intervention significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and showed a trend towards reduced urine sodium excretion in hypertensive patients. …”
-
2288
Demographic and baseline characteristics.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The combined intervention significantly decreased systolic blood pressure and showed a trend towards reduced urine sodium excretion in hypertensive patients. …”
-
2289
-
2290
-
2291
-
2292
-
2293
-
2294
Detailed analysis of the patellofemoral interactions after OWHTO in Knee 01.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2295
-
2296
-
2297
PRISMA flow chart.
Published 2025“…However, there was a decrease in stigma resistance (n = 318; <i>d</i>, 95% CI = -0.13, -0.36 to 0.10). …”
-
2298
Characteristics of included studies.
Published 2025“…However, there was a decrease in stigma resistance (n = 318; <i>d</i>, 95% CI = -0.13, -0.36 to 0.10). …”
-
2299
EPHPP tool quality assessment results.
Published 2025“…However, there was a decrease in stigma resistance (n = 318; <i>d</i>, 95% CI = -0.13, -0.36 to 0.10). …”
-
2300
Concentrations of C, N, and P in time change.
Published 2025“…Overall, converting forestland and grassland to cropland significantly reduced soil carbon-sequestration capacity, shifting them from “carbon sinks” to “carbon sources” and increasing carbon emission risks. …”