Search alternatives:
significant compare » significant compared (Expand Search), significant component (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compare differences » temporal differences (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
significant compare » significant compared (Expand Search), significant component (Expand Search), significant impact (Expand Search)
compare differences » temporal differences (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
-
41
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
42
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
48
Average effect size decreased as sample size increased for all types of analyses (<i>p</i> < .001).
Published 2022Subjects: -
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
Synaptopathy at IHC-SGN synapses decreases the peak of the CAP significantly, without changes to peak latency and width.
Published 2021“…The latencies of the CAP peaks did not exhibit any significant difference between different populations for all sound levels.…”
-
55
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
56
-
57
Comparison of mTOR expression grading among different groups at different time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
58
M<sup>pro</sup> confers a significant reduction in growth in yeast caused by decreases in a variety of cellular proteins.
Published 2023“…<p>A) The indicated SARS-CoV-2 genes regulated by a galactose inducible promoter were expressed in yeast and conferred growth defects compared to empty vector (EV). B) Bar graph shows the total growth of cultures after 72 hours normalized to EV. …”
-
59
-
60
GO analysis of stage-salient genes in the order of decreasing significance (i.e, increasing p–value).
Published 2022“…<p>GO analysis of stage-salient genes in the order of decreasing significance (i.e, increasing p–value).</p>…”