Search alternatives:
significant correlations » significant correlation (Expand Search), significantly correlated (Expand Search), significant associations (Expand Search)
correlations during » correlations among (Expand Search), populations during (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
significant correlations » significant correlation (Expand Search), significantly correlated (Expand Search), significant associations (Expand Search)
correlations during » correlations among (Expand Search), populations during (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Correlation analysis between physiological and biochemical indexes during seed desiccation.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3
-
4
List of the proteins that increased or decreased significantly with the progression of liver fibrosis.
Published 2022“…<p>List of the proteins that increased or decreased significantly with the progression of liver fibrosis.…”
-
5
Encapsulation efficiency significantly decreases with increasing starting bacterial concentration.
Published 2022“…Encapsulation efficiency decreased with increasing starting bacterial concentrations. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Principal component analysis between physiological and biochemical indexes during seed desiccation.
Published 2024Subjects: -
9
Changes in moisture content and germination of <i>Phoebe chekiangensis</i> seeds during desiccation.
Published 2024Subjects: -
10
Transcripts with increased translation efficiency during GSC to DGC transition have a significant loss in m6A methylation.
Published 2021“…Highlight identifies regions with median m6A change ≠ 0, corresponds to GSC 1,2 and 3 (n = 11179) and to top 40% transcripts with the highest increase in TE following differentiation. Change in TE rank obtained by measuring degree of change in TE of individual transcripts between their respective GSC and DGC state and then ranking the transcripts accordingly (ranges from highest rank: greatest increase in TE with transition; to lowest rank: most decrease in TE). …”
-
11
-
12
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
13
Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.
Published 2023“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
-
14
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Pain intensity amplification with either increases or decreases are independent of temperature but are correlated with each other.
Published 2020“…Heavy cyan lines represent best-fit lines from linear regression analysis with thin cyan lines representing bounds of the 95% confidence intervals calculated as part of the linear regression. No correlation exists between stimulus intensity (heat pain threshold (A or C) or T1 stimulus temperature used (B or D)) and pain intensity modulation during the t3 period by either preceding noxious temperature decreases (OS Min-T1) or increases (Inv Max-T2). …”
-
18
-
19
Noise correlations are significantly higher during naturalistic stimulus than during artificial stimulation.
Published 2024“…Noise correlations during naturalistic stimuli are significantly higher than that of during artificial stimuli (two-sample <i>t</i> test, <i>N</i> = 35 pairs, <i>p</i> = 3.2 × 10<sup>−5</sup>). …”
-
20