Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
2241
-
2242
-
2243
-
2244
Characteristics of study participants in women according to frailty groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2245
-
2246
-
2247
Supplementary Material for: Akkermansia muciniphila and Its Extracellular Vesicles affect endocannabinoid system in in vitro model
Published 2025“…A. muciniphila-derived EVs notably decreased the levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6), while increasing IL-10 expression at MOI 100 and an EV concentration of 100 μg/mL. …”
-
2248
Population density in the Durham–Chapel Hill MSA.
Published 2025“…For every person increase in household size a decrease there was a decrease in the AWM of fruit and vegetable markets and food banks by 40%. …”
-
2249
-
2250
-
2251
-
2252
-
2253
Analyzing the relationship between UACR (<30) and cognitive scores and impairment.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2254
Analyzing the relationship between UACR and cognitive scores and impairment.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2255
-
2256
Descriptive statistics and variable definitions.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2257
The results of endogenous analysis.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2258
Correlation test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2259
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2260
The mediation of confidence.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”