Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
linked decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
Showing 101 - 120 results of 13,627 for search '(( significant increase decrease ) OR ( significantly ((linked decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ))*', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 101

    Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex. by Kimberly Yuin Y’ng Wong (22766265)

    Published 2025
    “…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …”
  2. 102
  3. 103
  4. 104

    Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  5. 105

    Estimated mean values for light interception. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  6. 106

    Raw data V-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  7. 107

    Raw data D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116
  17. 117
  18. 118
  19. 119
  20. 120