Showing 21 - 40 results of 54 for search '(( significant increase decrease ) OR ( significantly ((worse decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 21

    Image 1_Kidney sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.tif by Leqing Zhou (20981021)

    Published 2025
    “…Patients treated with KSS were less likely to have hydronephrosis, more often had low-grade tumors, and were more frequently at a low-stage compared to those undergoing RNU. There were no significant differences between the KSS and RNU groups in terms of 5-year OS, 5-year CSS, 5-year RFS, 5-year IVRFS, 5-year MFS, and hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and CSS based on univariate or multivariable Cox regression analysis. …”
  2. 22

    Image 2_Kidney sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.tif by Leqing Zhou (20981021)

    Published 2025
    “…Patients treated with KSS were less likely to have hydronephrosis, more often had low-grade tumors, and were more frequently at a low-stage compared to those undergoing RNU. There were no significant differences between the KSS and RNU groups in terms of 5-year OS, 5-year CSS, 5-year RFS, 5-year IVRFS, 5-year MFS, and hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and CSS based on univariate or multivariable Cox regression analysis. …”
  3. 23

    Data Sheet 1_Metastatic organ count stratifies survival in immunotherapy-treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.docx by Hai-Yan Fu (1586935)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Conclusions<p>Increased metastatic organ count in patients with mCRC was associated with decreased immunotherapy ORR and worse prognosis, with a particularly pronounced effect observed in patients with lung metastasis.…”
  4. 24

    <b>Differential Myopathic and Transcriptomic Changes in Soleus and Gastrocnemius Muscles in a Novel Chronic Hindlimb Ischemia Rat Model Induced by Endovascular Catheter Occlusion</... by Hanjun Wang (21595280)

    Published 2025
    “…Histological analysis revealed that IFCO significantly increased levels of fibrosis and decreased myofiber cross-sectional area, in the soleus only. …”
  5. 25

    Data Sheet 1_Impact of mini-dose dexmedetomidine supplemented analgesia on sleep structure in patients at high risk of obstructive sleep apnea: a pilot trial.docx by Pei Sun (115160)

    Published 2024
    “…Mini-dose dexmedetomidine supplemented analgesia increased the percentage of stage N2 sleep (median difference, 10%; 95% CI, 1 to 21%; p = 0.029); it also decreased the percentage of stage N1 sleep (median difference, −10%; 95% CI, −20% to −1%; p = 0.042). …”
  6. 26

    Table 1_Effect of heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei KW3110 on mild to moderate seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in Japanese adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-co... by Yoshihiko Sugihara (2314381)

    Published 2025
    “…Diagnosis by an otorhinolaryngologist showed a significant decrease in the score of “paroxysmal sneezing or rhinorrhea” (p < 0.05) and “classification of severity of allergic rhinitis symptoms” (p < 0.05) at 4 weeks, and the number of subjects scoring “worse” (p < 0.05) in the efficacy assessment.…”
  7. 27

    Table 1_Microbial diversity and composition in the gut microbiome of patients during systemic inflammatory response syndrome: can we use gut bacteria as potential biomarkers to cha... by Rafaela Ramalho Guerra (22106579)

    Published 2025
    “…Early AT taxonomic profiling showed a decrease in Anaerobutyricum spp. and an increase in Holdemania spp. in the sepsis group. …”
  8. 28

    Table 1_Associations between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and depression among pregnant and postpartum women: analysis of NHANES 2005–2018.docx by Jian Qiao (26659)

    Published 2025
    “…Diets with very high proinflammatory potential were linked to significantly increased odds of perinatal depression, whereas more anti-inflammatory diets did not result in a further decrease in depression risk below that threshold. …”
  9. 29

    Table 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.docx by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  10. 30

    Data Sheet 2_Phase 2 trial (NCI-COTC030) of adjuvant inhaled recombinant human IL-15 combined with amputation and adjuvant chemotherapy in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma.pdf by Robert B. Rebhun (8479020)

    Published 2025
    “…Although plasma concentrations of key cytokines varied markedly with no significant differences between disease-free and metastatic-failure patients, inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 showed absolute increases post-amputation and post-chemotherapy, correlating with decreases in cytotoxicity. …”
  11. 31

    Data Sheet 1_Phase 2 trial (NCI-COTC030) of adjuvant inhaled recombinant human IL-15 combined with amputation and adjuvant chemotherapy in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma.pdf by Robert B. Rebhun (8479020)

    Published 2025
    “…Although plasma concentrations of key cytokines varied markedly with no significant differences between disease-free and metastatic-failure patients, inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 showed absolute increases post-amputation and post-chemotherapy, correlating with decreases in cytotoxicity. …”
  12. 32

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  13. 33

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  14. 34

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  15. 35

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  16. 36

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  17. 37

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  18. 38

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  19. 39

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  20. 40

    Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”