Showing 141 - 160 results of 93,480 for search '(( significant increase regression ) OR ( significant ((small decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 2.01s Refine Results
  1. 141

    Baseline regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  2. 142
  3. 143

    Cox regression analysis results. by Zhendong Sun (4723221)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on Cox semi-parametric multi-factor analysis results, the parking duration is significantly influenced by weekdays (regression coefficient = 0.068, hazard ratio = 1.071, P < 0.001), weekends (regression coefficient = 0.042, hazard ratio = 1.043,P < 0.001), moderate rain (regression coefficient = -0.089, hazard ratio = 0.914, P < 0.001), and heavy rain (regression coefficient = 0.030, hazard ratio = 1.030,P = 0.034 < 0.05). …”
  4. 144
  5. 145
  6. 146
  7. 147

    Data Sheet 1_Elevated relative humidity significantly decreases cannabinoid concentrations while delaying flowering development in Cannabis sativa L..docx by Ingrid Carolina Corredor-Perilla (22631510)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, high RH significantly suppressed cannabinoid accumulation: cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabichromenic acid (CBC-A) levels decreased by approximately 4.9-fold, 3.2-fold, and 13-fold, respectively. …”
  8. 148
  9. 149
  10. 150
  11. 151
  12. 152
  13. 153
  14. 154
  15. 155
  16. 156
  17. 157

    Regression results of the Callaway method. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  18. 158

    Instrumental variable regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  19. 159

    Other robust regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  20. 160