Search alternatives:
significant increased » significant increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
increased costs » increased odds (Expand Search), increased risks (Expand Search), increased access (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
significant increased » significant increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
increased costs » increased odds (Expand Search), increased risks (Expand Search), increased access (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
Time course of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…In contrast, BCVA in the non-recurrence group significantly improved from 0.31 ± 0.25 preoperatively to 0.25 ± 0.25, 0.23 ± 0.26, 0.23 ± 0.28, 0.21 ± 0.27, 0.20 ± 0.30, and 0.16 ± 0.30 over the same time points (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
DIP grouping and aggregation system.
Published 2025“…Drug and surgical costs declined significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups, while consumable costs increased significantly (p < 0.05). …”
-
72
DIP coding logic example.
Published 2025“…Drug and surgical costs declined significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups, while consumable costs increased significantly (p < 0.05). …”
-
73
DIP pre-payment and provider behavior mechanism.
Published 2025“…Drug and surgical costs declined significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups, while consumable costs increased significantly (p < 0.05). …”
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
Relative percent change (%) in cancer incidence by cancer type (2019 vs 2020).
Published 2024Subjects: -
80